Economics | Market failure—asymmetric information (HL only)

Market Failure: Asymmetric Information (HL Extension)

Hello HL Economists! This is where we dive deep into one of the trickiest and most fascinating types of market failure. Don't worry if this seems complicated at first—we’re just looking at what happens when people in a market don't have all the facts. Since you are HL students, understanding this concept is crucial for grasping why real-world markets often fail to achieve that perfect, efficient equilibrium!

Key Concept Focus: This section explains how unequal access to information (Asymmetric Information) leads to inefficiency and market failure, focusing on two critical consequences: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard.

---

1. Defining Asymmetric Information (AI)

What is Asymmetric Information?

Asymmetric Information (AI) occurs when one party in an economic transaction has significantly more or better information than the other party. This inequality prevents the market from operating efficiently.

• Analogy: Imagine playing a game of poker where one player can secretly see the other player’s hand. The game is fundamentally unfair and inefficient due to the information asymmetry.
• Informed Party: The person/firm with the superior knowledge.
• Uninformed Party: The person/firm with less knowledge, who faces uncertainty.

AI and Market Failure

For markets to achieve allocative efficiency (where marginal social benefit equals marginal social cost), we assume perfect information. When AI exists, the uninformed party cannot make rational choices, leading to:

• Misallocation of resources.
• A reduction in the quantity traded below the social optimum (underproduction).
• Potential collapse of the entire market.

Quick Takeaway: AI means information is unevenly distributed, destroying the fundamental assumption of rational decision-making and causing market failure.

---

2. The Two Faces of Asymmetric Information

Asymmetric information typically results in two distinct problems, depending on when the information problem occurs relative to the transaction.

2.1. Adverse Selection (Pre-Contractual Problem)

Adverse Selection occurs before a transaction or contract is completed. The uninformed party cannot distinguish between high-risk (bad quality) and low-risk (good quality) individuals or products.

Because the uninformed party cannot differentiate, they often offer a single price or contract terms based on the average quality. This drives the high-quality products or low-risk individuals out of the market.

Real-World Example 1: The "Lemon Problem" (Used Cars)

1. The seller knows the true quality of the car (whether it’s a high-quality "peach" or a low-quality "lemon").
2. The buyer cannot tell the difference (AI exists).
3. The buyer is only willing to pay a price reflecting the average quality of all used cars.
4. Sellers of high-quality cars ("peaches") won't sell at the average price and withdraw from the market.
5. Eventually, only low-quality cars ("lemons") remain, leading to a breakdown of the used car market.

This process is called adverse selection because the selection of products or participants remaining in the market is adverse (bad) for the buyers.

Real-World Example 2: Health Insurance

People who are chronically ill (high risk) are much more likely to seek out comprehensive health insurance than healthy people (low risk). The insurer (uninformed party) cannot perfectly assess individual risk.

• If the insurer charges a price based on the average risk, healthy people will find the policy too expensive and won't buy it.
• Only high-risk people remain in the pool, forcing the insurer to raise premiums further, potentially leading to the collapse of the individual insurance market.

🔥 Memory Aid for Adverse Selection: **A**dverse Selection happens **A**head of the deal (before the contract). It’s a problem of hidden characteristics.

2.2. Moral Hazard (Post-Contractual Problem)

Moral Hazard occurs after a transaction or contract has been completed. It arises because one party changes their behavior once the contract or agreement is in place, knowing that the other party will bear the cost of that change.

It is a problem of hidden actions.

Real-World Example 1: Property Insurance

1. You buy comprehensive fire insurance for your house.
2. Once insured, you might become less careful about maintaining fire safety (e.g., forgetting to check smoke detector batteries or leaving doors unlocked).
3. You have changed your behavior because the cost of damage is largely borne by the insurance company, not you.
4. This risky, hidden behavior is the moral hazard.

Real-World Example 2: Financial Markets (The Banking Crisis)

When a government guarantees that it will bail out large banks if they fail (a concept known as "too big to fail"), the banks might engage in riskier lending and investment activities. They know that if the risks pay off, they keep the profit; if they fail, the taxpayer (the government) bears the loss.

The Hazard: The promise of a bailout encourages immoral or excessive risk-taking behavior.

🔥 Memory Aid for Moral Hazard: **M**oral Hazard involves **M**istakes or behavioral changes **M**id-contract (after the deal). It’s a problem of hidden actions.

Key Takeaway: Adverse Selection screens out good quality before the deal; Moral Hazard encourages bad behavior after the deal. Both result in inefficient market outcomes.

---

3. Solutions to Asymmetric Information

Both markets and governments attempt to reduce the knowledge gap to restore efficiency. Solutions generally fall into two categories: signalling and screening (market-based), and regulation (government-based).

3.1. Market-Based Solutions

These solutions involve the parties themselves trying to overcome the information asymmetry.

i. Signalling (Informed Party Takes Action)

Signalling involves the party with the superior information taking action to credibly communicate their high quality or low risk to the uninformed party.

• Example: A used car dealer offers a long, expensive warranty. The cost of offering a warranty is too high for a seller of a "lemon," so this acts as a credible signal that the car is indeed high quality.
• Example: Individuals obtaining prestigious university degrees (like the IB Diploma!). The degree signals to potential employers that the individual is intelligent, disciplined, and hard-working.

ii. Screening (Uninformed Party Takes Action)

Screening involves the party with the inferior information taking action to try and determine the quality or risk level of the informed party.

• Example: Insurance companies charge a deductible (or "excess"). If you have to pay the first $500 of any claim, you have an incentive to be more careful (reducing moral hazard) and only genuine claimants will use the insurance (screening out minor claims).
• Example: An employer requires a detailed resume, references, or performs background checks.

Did you know? The concept of adverse selection was famously analyzed using the used car market by economist George Akerlof in his 1970 paper, "The Market for 'Lemons'," which later contributed to his Nobel Prize in Economics.

3.2. Government Intervention

Governments intervene to provide mandatory information or enforce behavior to counter the market failure.

i. Regulation and Legislation

The government sets standards to ensure minimum quality or mandatory participation, thus reducing AI.

• Standardization: Establishing minimum quality standards (e.g., food safety laws, mandatory vehicle inspections, professional licensing requirements). This tackles adverse selection by guaranteeing all products meet a basic level.
• Mandatory Insurance/Disclosure: Requiring all individuals to participate in an insurance scheme (e.g., compulsory basic car liability insurance). This ensures low-risk individuals cannot opt out, solving the adverse selection problem in insurance.
• Consumer Protection Laws: Requiring firms to truthfully disclose information about their products.

ii. Provision of Information

The government can act as a neutral third party to provide reliable data, leveling the information field.

• Example: Providing free, publicly accessible credit ratings or historical property data.

Key Takeaway: Market solutions rely on signalling (informed party) and screening (uninformed party). Government solutions focus on mandatory standards and information provision.

---

Quick Review: Asymmetric Information