👋 Welcome to Managing Tourist Destinations!
This chapter is all about how we keep tourist hotspots amazing—not just for visitors, but for the local people and the environment too! As international tourism booms, managing these places becomes one of the biggest challenges in human geography.
We will explore the key models, impacts, and strategies geographers use to try and make tourism truly sustainable. Don't worry if complex terms like 'carrying capacity' seem tricky; we'll break them down using simple, real-world examples.
1. Context: Why Do Tourist Destinations Need Management?
Tourism grows rapidly due to factors like cheaper air travel, increased disposable income in HICs/MICs, and better communications. However, this growth often leads to significant problems, demanding careful management to ensure longevity and fairness.
1.1 Impacts of Tourism (The Need for Control)
Uncontrolled tourism creates friction and degradation. Management aims to balance these impacts:
Economic Impacts
- Positive: Job creation (direct and indirect), infrastructure improvement, generation of foreign exchange earnings.
- Negative: Economic leakage (money leaves the host country), reliance on seasonal work, inflation of local prices (e.g., housing).
Social Impacts
- Positive: Cultural exchange, preservation of heritage sites (as they generate income).
- Negative: Demonstration effect (local people adopt visitor behaviours, sometimes negatively), loss of traditional culture (commercialisation), increased crime, and congestion.
Environmental Impacts
- Positive: Creation of protected areas (national parks) for tourists.
- Negative: Land and habitat degradation (e.g., coral reef damage, footpath erosion), increased waste and pollution (air, noise, water), and strain on local resources (water, energy).
Quick Takeaway: Tourism brings benefits, but the negatives (especially environmental and social degradation) are the primary drivers for management intervention.
2. Core Management Concepts
2.1 Carrying Capacity (CC)
The concept of carrying capacity is crucial for destination management. It means the maximum number of people an area can sustainably support without irreversible damage to the environment and culture, and without an unacceptable decline in visitor experience.
Analogy: Think of a small coffee shop. It can seat 20 people comfortably (that’s its carrying capacity). If 50 people cram in, the experience declines dramatically (crowding), and the plumbing might break (environmental strain).
There are several types of Carrying Capacity:
- Physical Carrying Capacity (PCC): The maximum number of visitors an area can physically hold at any one time. (Example: The number of available parking spaces or hotel rooms.)
- Environmental Carrying Capacity (ECC): The level of tourism an environment can absorb before significant damage occurs. (Example: How many tourists can walk on a sensitive beach ecosystem before erosion becomes severe.)
- Social or Perceptual Carrying Capacity (SCC): The maximum level of tourism a local community or the visitors themselves can tolerate before the quality of life or the visitor experience decreases. (Example: Locals feeling crowded out of their own town centres.)
Did you know? Carrying Capacity is subjective and dynamic. It changes based on the time of year (seasonality) and the type of tourist (a hiker requires less ECC than a cruise ship passenger).
2.2 The Tourism Multiplier Effect
The tourism multiplier effect describes how money injected into the economy by tourists cycles through the local community, creating wealth far exceeding the initial spending.
This concept is vital for managers as it shows the economic value of attracting tourists, but it also highlights the problem of leakage.
The multiplier effect typically involves three stages:
- Direct Income: The initial money spent by the tourist (e.g., paying the hotel bill).
- Indirect Income: The hotel uses that money to buy supplies (food, electricity) from other local businesses.
- Induced Income: Employees (hotel staff, supply company workers) use their wages to buy goods and services (groceries, haircuts), supporting a wider range of the local economy.
Management Goal: Destination managers try to maximise the multiplier effect by encouraging tourists to buy local products and ensuring businesses employ local people. This minimises economic leakage (money leaving the destination area, often to foreign TNCs or imported goods).
Quick Review: Carrying Capacity tells you how many people you can have; the Multiplier Effect tells you how much money they generate.
3. Evaluating Destination Growth: The Life Cycle Model
3.1 Butler's Tourism Life Cycle Model (TLCM)
The Butler Model (1980) suggests that all tourist destinations follow a predictable path of growth and eventual decline or renewal. Managers use this model to predict challenges and plan interventions before they reach the decline stage.
It is important to remember this is a theoretical model—not every destination fits it perfectly, but it provides an excellent framework for evaluation.
The Six Stages of the TLCM:
- Exploration: A small number of visitors (Pioneers) attracted by unique, unspoilt natural or cultural features. No special facilities exist; local people run services informally.
- Involvement: Locals start providing basic facilities. A tourist season begins to emerge. Some basic infrastructure (like rough roads) might develop.
- Development: Large, external companies (TNCs) invest heavily. The number of tourists equals or exceeds the local population. Mass tourism begins, and the destination becomes clearly defined as a tourist region.
- Consolidation: Growth slows down. The industry is highly commercialised. Some tensions between tourists and locals might appear, and the destination starts relying on repeat visitors.
- Stagnation: Peak numbers reached. The destination becomes unfashionable, resorts are aged, and the original natural/cultural appeal is replaced by cheap, artificial attractions. Capacity limits are severely stressed.
-
Decline or Rejuvenation:
- Decline: The destination fails to compete, tourists go elsewhere, and tourism assets are converted to non-tourist uses (e.g., hotels converted to retirement homes).
- Rejuvenation: New investment (e.g., casinos, niche markets like ecotourism, major event hosting) renews the appeal. This requires difficult management decisions.
Management Insight: The model is useful because management interventions (like investing in ecotourism or limiting hotel construction) are most effective in the Involvement or early Development stages, preventing the destination from reaching Stagnation.
4. The Goal of Sustainable Management
The overriding goal of modern destination management is sustainability. Sustainable tourism aims to meet the needs of present tourists and host regions while protecting and enhancing opportunities for the future.
4.1 Sustainable Strategies
Management strategies can be broadly split into two approaches, similar to flood management:
- Hard Management: Involves strict controls, often physical or legal. (Example: Limiting the number of visitors per day, imposing heavy tourist taxes, banning large cruise ships from certain ports.)
- Soft Management: Involves persuasion, education, and marketing. (Example: Promoting off-season travel, creating eco-labels for responsible hotels, directing tourists to less sensitive areas via signage.)
4.2 Recent Development: Ecotourism
The syllabus highlights ecotourism as a key development. Ecotourism is responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the well-being of the local people, and involves interpretation and education.
Ecotourism is often a key management strategy aimed at rejuvenation or maintaining sustainability from the outset (Exploration/Involvement stages).
Key characteristics of successful ecotourism:
- Minimises negative environmental impact (low ECC).
- Provides financial benefits for conservation.
- Generates revenue directly for local communities (maximises multiplier).
- Increases environmental and cultural awareness among tourists.
Common Mistake Alert! Ecotourism is often confused with 'sustainable tourism.' Ecotourism is a specific type of tourism (focusing on nature). Sustainable tourism is the overarching goal or management approach for any type of tourism (beach, city, or nature).
5. Case Study Focus: Managing a Tourist Destination (13.4)
For the A Level exam, you must have a detailed case study of one tourist area or resort, focusing on its growth, sustainability issues, and the evaluation of attempted solutions.
5.1 Selecting and Structuring Your Case Study
A strong case study (e.g., *Venice, Italy; Barcelona, Spain; or the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador*) must cover the following elements:
Step 1: Growth and Development (Context)
Identify the initial attractions (physical/human) and how the destination moved through the Butler Model stages.
Step 2: Issues of Sustainability
Detail the specific problems faced by the destination, referencing carrying capacity failure:
- Environmental: *Example: Venice* - High waves from tourist boats eroding the foundations; pollution in canals.
- Social: *Example: Barcelona* - 'Overtourism' leading to affordable housing shortages and displacement of locals.
- Economic: High leakage due to foreign-owned chain shops and hotels.
Step 3: Management Strategies (Attempted Solutions)
What actual steps have managers (local governments, NGOs, national bodies) taken?
- Regulatory/Financial: Introduction of visitor quotas, tourist taxes, restrictions on short-term rentals (like Airbnb).
- Infrastructure/Physical: Developing new routes to divert traffic, investing in public transport, implementing conservation zones.
- Marketing/Soft: Promoting alternative sites, encouraging ethical visitor behaviour, extending the tourist season into 'shoulder months.'
Step 4: Evaluation (Success and Failure)
This is the most critical step for A Level evaluation. Assess the relative success or failure of the initiatives.
- Success Criteria: Did the strategy reduce impacts? Was it economically viable? Was it socially accepted by locals?
- Challenges/Failure: *Example: Venice’s* plan to ban large cruise ships was delayed due to lobbying; tourist tax is often too small to curb visitor numbers significantly.
Key Takeaway: Management is not about eliminating tourism, but about balancing stakeholders’ interests—local residents, the environment, tourists, and business owners. Sustainable management requires difficult, often unpopular, policy choices.